[ad_1]
One other new digital camera, one other new comparability. This time we’re taking a better have a look at the Canon R5 C which was simply launched just a few weeks in the past. Whereas a lot of the imaging pipeline is counting on current tech from the unique R5 which we’re conversant in there are some tweaks and updates taken from Canon’s Cinema EOS line which will end in barely completely different picture high quality.
In the present day, we’re going to try how the R5 C holds up in dynamic vary as the fellows at ProAV TV put collectively a pleasant comparability between it, the R5, the C70, and even the Sony a7S III.
That is really a collection of assessments that ProAV TV is planning on doing with the R5 C. They’re beginning with the all-important dynamic vary. Their check includes over and underexposing some footage and performing corrections to see how properly the footage holds up.
Usually they persist with utilizing the aperture with supplementary changes to shutter pace. It’s a really sensible and efficient check of how the digital camera holds up.
Picture Credit score: Canon
On this check, since they’re utilizing so many alternative cameras, they’re sticking to simply the min and max assessments of 4 stops over and 4 stops underneath.
Beginning off with the R5 C subsequent to the R5 we see some similarities. At 4 stops over each are clipping the face, although possibly there’s a contact extra info within the R5 C. Now, at 4 stops underneath you’ll be able to see a distinction because the R5 has numerous magenta noise which doesn’t present within the R5 C. That is probably a change in how the picture is processed.
Picture Credit score: Canon
Another excuse that the R5 C appears to carry out higher than the R5 is the codec. The XF-AVC on the R5 C appears to look higher and extra pure at these excessive settings. It holds up higher. The R5 C appears to have a bigger usable dynamic vary than the unique R5.
Picture Credit score: Sony
Subsequent up is the R5 C up in opposition to the a7S III and the C70. These are three very completely different cameras. Instantly, you will note much more element within the overexposure check. The face simply holds on to extra element, it could possibly be due to the completely different curve of S-Log3 vs Canon Log 3.
With the C70, you see a little bit extra clipping than the others. This may be trigger we’re in C-Log3 as a substitute of C-Log2, which simply may squeeze out extra dynamic vary with the C70. The C70 does have a bigger dynamic vary on paper. By way of extra subjective comparisons, the a7S III positively holds on to extra element, but it surely does seem rather less pure when corrected.
Picture Credit score: Canon
With underneath publicity, the C70 appears to take the lead with efficiency. It appears to be like far more pure when corrected. It’s noisy nonetheless, however the ranges are extra pure feeling. The a7S III and R5 C have a extra distinct, digital look with horizontal noise bands. The Twin Acquire Output sensor of the C70 appears to be saving the day right here.
Now for the enjoyable half, evaluating to the outdated 1D C. At 4 stops over the 1D C is simply gone with no element in any respect within the face. Past that even the background is failing in sustaining correct colour. In underneath publicity, it’s a related image with unnatural-looking colours and pores and skin tones. The ten years because the 1D C do present that technological developments within the R5 C are large.
Total, the R5 C is doing an unimaginable job with dynamic vary. It seems to be pushing the written ranking of 14+ stops for positive when capturing in Canon Log 3.
What did you consider this check? Do you agree with their evaluation?
[source: ProAV TV]
Order Hyperlinks:
Canon EOS R5 C Mirrorless Cinema Digicam (B&H)
Canon EOS R5 Mirrorless Digicam (B&H, Amazon)
Canon EOS C70 Cinema Digicam (B&H)
Sony a7S III Mirrorless Digicam (B&H, Amazon)
[ad_2]