[ad_1]
Since model 9 Pie, Google has launched a brand new main replace to Android yearly between August and September. And work on the developer preview of the next model begins about six months later. In actuality, the scenario is much more complicated as a result of there are additionally Quarterly Platform Releases. That are theoretically quarterly intermediate releases between main releases. Yearly, we see discussions about how Android is consistently bettering. However on this article, we’ll talk about if these annual updates are actually vital anymore.
No want for a brand new Android yearly?
Google updates extra often than Apple. It additionally releases its new iPhones in September together with the brand new iOS yearly. The difficulty is that the comparability of the 2 working techniques is sensible from a media perspective. It is unnecessary virtually.
As a result of Google has a distributed technique, Android, in contrast to iOS, requires much less and fewer working system updates to supply new features to its customers. Regardless of the person’s smartphone model or Android model, Google’s aim from venture treble is to replace as many parts as attainable by way of the Play Retailer / Play Providers for as many customers as attainable directly.
On iOS, issues are totally different, and generally updating some apps and options additionally requires updating the working system. Consider the dynamic island of the iPhone 14. To see how often the brand new iPhones truly require a brand new working system. Apple produces each {hardware} and software program, and the primary is made taking into consideration the particularities of the second.
In brief, chasing Apple on this approach is absurd as a result of the Cupertino firm’s motivations are totally different from Google’s and Android’s.
Gizchina Information of the week
As a result of it’s so assorted, Android is beautiful. There are such a lot of totally different producers (Samsung clearly is promoting most of all of them). And every one has a singular interface that goals to reinforce Android. Or in any other case make it extra distinctive for its customers. It’s unlucky that numerous OEMs are discovering it more durable to maintain up with the updates. Particularly since Google has given the working system yearly updates.
The third-party producers are struggling behind
There’s truly not a lot time left between one main launch of Android and the subsequent. And there’s no sufficient time for third-party producers to step in and add one thing new to its interfaces. At most, it is going to accomplish that on the launch of the subsequent model of the OS, however including extra new options (along with these introduced by Google and which then should be applied or not) simply leads to delays that essentially the most devoted customers won’t like.
MIUI, One UI, Colour OS, and so on. are, briefly, much less dynamic than they as soon as had been. That is due, partially, to the truth that they have to sustain with a quick tempo. With a purpose to launch their model of the brand new Android yearly. Which often introduces modifications which will have already been current for a while within the person interface.
Don’t get me fallacious; updates are essential, significantly safety updates that add one other brick to every smartphone’s protection. Having mentioned that, the need of launching an Android 13. Which within the eyes of customers is just a 12.1. And forcing numerous producers to replace as rapidly as attainable, is unnecessary.
And the identical argument will be for Put on OS as properly. Which has a extra difficult historical past than Android however has just lately acquired a renewal.
Given the success of the Apple Watch, it may be value inserting extra deal with the brand new variations. However this doesn’t essentially indicate that they need to grow to be yearly. Google ought to undertake a brand new extra ample methodology for updates.
[ad_2]