Which of Intel’s flagships is finest?
Up to date: Oct 24, 2024 5:47 pm
WePC is reader-supported. Once you purchase by hyperlinks on our web site, we could earn an affiliate fee. Costs topic to vary. Study extra
Desk of Contents
Desk of Contents
Intel’s Core Extremely 9 285K has simply been launched into the wild, marking the primary set of non-hyperthreaded Intel CPUs in over 22 years. A daring selection, however will it maintain up towards the earlier technology of Intel CPUs? We pit them face to face to seek out out which is best.
The Core Extremely 9 285K is an 8 P-core 16 E-core CPU, totaling 24 threads. Regardless of the dearth of threads, it does carry out pretty nicely contemplating the quantity of energy it consumes. When you care deeply about energy effectivity, this may very well be the CPU for you. However if you need uncooked gaming efficiency, the 14900K continues to be the one to beat.
Intel Core Extremely 9 285K
Execs
Very environment friendly throughout all workloads
Cheaper than AMD flagship
A lot better multi-core efficiency than 9950X
Cons
Underwhelming gaming efficiency
Seems like one thing is lacking
Too targeted on effectivity
Intel Core i9-14900K
Execs
Environment friendly efficiency features over the past technology
Greater DDR5 XMP speeds past 8000MT/s
Overclocking potential is excessive
Intel Software Optimization is spectacular
Cons
Has points with ASUS MCE tech at current
CPU Specification Comparability
It’s essential to investigate the specs of every CPU, so we all know what we’re evaluating. This helps us higher perceive why one CPU did higher and the way.
Element Core Extremely 285KCore i9 14900KCores2424Threads 2432Hybrid architectureP-core: 8E-core: 16P-core: 8E-core: 16Base frequencyP-core: 3.7 GHzE-core: 3.2 GHzP-core: 3.2 GHzE-core: 2.4 GHzBoost frequency P-core: 5.5 GHzE-core: 4.6 GHzP-core: 5.6 GHzE-core: 4.4 GHzMemory speed6400 MT/s5600 MT/sPCI Specific lanes20 (Gen 5)16 (Gen 5)L2 cache 3 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)L3 cache36 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)TDP / PL1 / PL2 / PL2 (excessive)125W / 250W / 250W / 295W125W / 253W / 253W / UnlimitedProcess size3 nm10 nmSocketLGA 1815 (appropriate with Z980)LGA 1700 (appropriate with Z790, B760, Z690, B660, H610)Core Ultea 285K vs 14900K specs
The best disparity between these two CPUs is the scale of the manufacturing course of and the inclusion of hyperthreaded cores. Specs appear to point that the 285K will wipe the ground with the older 14900K, provided that AMD has proven us simply what it will possibly do with a 1 nm lower within the manufacturing course of – and Intel went forward and shaved 7 nm off its transistors.
The 14900K has an edge when it comes to uncooked computing energy because it has extra logical processors – eight extra to be exact. regardless of how small your transistors are, that’s laborious to compete with. All the things else stays comparable and displays comparable generational enhancements however within the flawed path. The 14900K possesses quicker base speeds and solely barely quicker increase speeds. More likely to save on energy.
CPU benchmark efficiency
Earlier than we begin with the benchmarks, it’s essential to stipulate the specs of our benchmarking rig. We at all times goal to maintain issues as honest as potential and attempt to use comparable elements, even intergenerationally.
Element NameCPUIntel: Intel Core Extremely 285K / Core i9-14900KCoolerCorsair H150i Elite LCDMotherboardIntel: ASUS Maximus Hero Z890 / ASUS ROG Maximus Hero Z790MemoryCorsair Dominator Platinum DDR5 @6800 MHzGPUMSI RTX 4070 Ti PSUASUS Thor Platinum II 1000WCaseCooler Grasp Masterframe WePC take a look at bench elements
There’s not an enormous distinction in tech when evaluating the 285K and the 14900K, though the socket has modified, they’re each on the DDR5 reminiscence commonplace, so we will use the identical RAM. They usually settle for the identical GPU and PSU format.
Gaming and artificial efficiency
285k vs 14900K common fps
285K vs 14900K energy consumption
285K vs 14900K multi core
285K vs 14900K single core
Earlier
Subsequent
On paper, the battle between Intel’s 285K vs 14900K was comparatively shut – actually from a multi-core, single-core, and gaming perspective. Nevertheless, as we’ll contact upon in additional element shortly, the primary generational uplift appears to be within the effectivity class – the place the 285K runs at practically half the facility necessities of the 14900K.
Earlier than we dive into that although, let’s take a better take a look at the gaming benchmarks. When trying on the side-by-side comparisons of the pattern video games we examined, there was little distinction between the brand new flagship 285K and the 14900K. The truth is, many of the video games noticed the 285K supply decrease common frames per second, particularly when evaluating titles reminiscent of CS2 and Days Gone. General, the 14900K was the clear winner right here – which actually appears like a step backwards for the model’s new flagship CPU.
285k vs 14900K common fps
Shifting onto synthetic-based duties, there are few variations to remove. The Core Extremely 9 does carry out to the next degree in each single core and multi-core workloads, highlighted in our checks of CPU Z Multi, Cinebench R23 Multi, and Geekbench Multi. Sadly, the generational uplift is within the low single digits, that means there isn’t an excessive amount of efficiency to be gained from upgrading from the 14900K to the 285K.
Effectivity, nonetheless, is the place we now have a transparent winner. As you possibly can see from each the artificial common energy consumption chart and the gaming common energy consumption chart, the Intel Core Extremely 9 285K is a much more environment friendly chip. The truth is, in the course of the gaming portion of our checks, the 285K ran at nearly half the facility consumption of the 14900K – which is a reasonably spectacular feat when all issues are thought of. That mentioned, whereas that is nice for power-conscious people, I’m not 100% positive who’s going to be getting overly excited over higher effectivity. It’s actually not sufficient to make me wish to run out and improve my chip for.
Are there any notable platform variations?
There aren’t too many platform variations between LGA 1851 and LGA 1700, aside from the socket, in fact. When you ask us, LGA 1700 holds the benefit of being extra inexpensive and outfitted with (largely) the identical options. Excessive-end LGA 1851 motherboards function PCIe Gen 5 on each the GPU and storage connectors, have extra PCIe lanes (20 in comparison with 16), and supply USB 4 and Wifi 7 as commonplace.
If none of those options attraction to you, then you possibly can most likely skip the 285K and go for the 14900K, because it performs significantly better in gaming workloads. Nevertheless, when you crave the newest multi-core efficiency prowess, and wish to achieve this with unimaginable effectivity, you must get a motherboard on the LGA 1851 platform – because it’s the one one which the 285K helps.
Do you have to purchase the 285K?
If you’d like the very best gaming rig that cash should buy, look ahead to the 9800X3D. If the 5800X3D has taught us something, it’s that cache is every part in terms of environment friendly gaming. The 7800X3D additionally pushed previous the 285K when it got here to gaming however fell very quick when it got here to workstation duties and artificial efficiency.
Finally, you’ve bought to return fairly a number of generations to discover a CPU that provides sufficient of a efficiency deficit in each synthetics/gaming and energy effectivity to make you wish to run out and improve this factor. Sadly, as we coated in a latest function, it appears like Intel has handed AMD the keys to a whole technology of shoppers – particularly while you issue within the soon-to-be-released 9000 X3D fashions.
Last phrase
There you could have it, our complete roundup of the primary efficiency variations when pitting the brand new Intel Core Extremely 9 285K towards its predecessor, the Intel i9 14900K. Finally, the battle was fairly shut, and sadly for Intel, there’s actually no cause to exit and improve to the 285K when you’re already working the 14900K.
That being mentioned, when you presently personal an Intel chip that could be a few generations outdated, then you definitely is perhaps questioning which is finest, the 285K or the 14900K. General, the CPUs have been comparatively carefully matched, with few variations present in the primary efficiency benchmarks we ran. That being mentioned, there’s a clear winner in terms of effectivity – and that’s the Core Extremely 285K. Intel have completed an awesome job of bettering the effectivity of this chip over the 14th Gen flagship – a lot in order that, in some eventualities, the 285K attracts nearly half the facility of the 14900K. Keep in mind although, there are a number of caveats when choosing the 285K, with the most important being its new chipset – which implies a model new motherboard. When you’re blissful to do a full PC improve, and effectivity is the primary focus, then Core Extremely 9 is okay selection. Nevertheless, when you’re trying to save a couple of dollars and wish to squeeze each final drop of efficiency out of the CPU – in each gaming and heavy workloads – then the 14900K might be nonetheless your finest guess.