Intel’s latest VS AMD’s greatest Up to date: Oct 24, 2024 3:18 pm WePC is reader-supported. Once you purchase by hyperlinks on our web site, we might earn an affiliate fee. Costs topic to vary. Study extra Desk of Contents Desk of Contents Intel has simply launched the Core Extremely 9 285K, the most recent flagship CPU on the Arrow Lake structure. Earlier than its launch, we noticed glimpses of the record-breaking efficiency it may supply, however does it nonetheless maintain up in opposition to arguably the world’s hottest gaming CPU, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D? Quite a lot of modifications have been made to Intel’s newest technology desktop CPU vary, some extra questionable than others – like ditching hyperthreading (a characteristic that’s been a staple of Intel CPUs for over 22 years). Whereas Intel’s resolution to drop hyperthreading would possibly increase some eyebrows, they’ve clearly doubled down on productiveness efficiency. As we famous in our evaluate, the Core Extremely 9 285K shines in heavy workloads, although it doesn’t fairly hit the mark we hoped for in gaming – which is the place the 7800X3D shines. Intel has made an enormous effectivity play with the fifteenth technology CPUs, and sadly, that appears to be to the detriment of gaming efficiency. The model even got here out saying its flagship could be roughly 5% down VS the 7800X3D – making this battle an attention-grabbing one to say the least. So, does it nonetheless have sufficient in it to beat the 7800X3D – let’s discover out. Intel Core Extremely 9 285K Professionals Very environment friendly throughout all workloads Cheaper than AMD flagship Significantly better multi-core efficiency than 9950X Cons Underwhelming gaming efficiency Looks like one thing is lacking Too targeted on effectivity AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Professionals As much as 7% quicker than 13900K Insane gaming efficiency for the cash Cons One CCD restricted by V-cache At a look Core Extremely 9 285K vs. Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Intel’s newest flagship drops hyperthreading for productiveness beneficial properties, whereas AMD’s 7800X3D stays a high gaming selection with its 96 MB L3 cache. Efficiency: The 285K’s 24-core design excels in multi-core workloads however falls quick in gaming in comparison with the 7800X3D’s larger body charges. Platform Variations: Intel presents quicker reminiscence (6400 MT/s) with its Z890 chipset, whereas AMD’s AM5 socket gives broader compatibility for simpler upgrades. Energy Effectivity: AMD’s CPU is extra power-efficient in gaming, making it ideally suited for decrease temperatures and regular body charges. Future Outlook: Players might need to await the 9800X3D’s launch, which may outshine each CPUs, whereas the 285K stays robust for productiveness wants. Facet by aspect specs: 285K Vs 7800X3D It’s vital to research the paper specs of every CPU, so we all know what we’re evaluating. Doing this may also help us perceive why one element (not simply CPUs) benchmarks higher in sure workloads. Part Core Extremely 285KRyzen 7 7800X3DCores248Threads 2416Hybrid architectureP-core: 8E-core: 16N/ABase frequencyP-core: 3.7 GHzE-core: 3.2 GHz4.2 GHzBoost frequency P-core: 5.5 GHzE-core: 4.6 GHzUp to five GHzMemory speed6400 MT/s5200 MT/sPCI Specific lanes20 (Gen 5)24 (Gen 5)L2 cache 3 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)L3 cache36 MB (shared)96 MB (shared)TDP / PL1 / PL2 / PL2 (excessive)125W / 250W / 250W / 295W120W / 162W / 162W / 162WProcess size3 nm5 nmSocketLGA 1815 (suitable with Z980)LGA 1718 (suitable with X870, B850, X670, B650, A620)Core Ultea 285K vs 7800X3D specs The Core Extremely 9 285K and Ryzen 7 7800X3D are basically very completely different of their designs, concentrating on completely different areas of efficiency. The 285K brings a hybrid structure to the desk, with a mix of 8 P-cores and 16 E-cores. This setup is all about dealing with a mixture of workloads, balancing single-threaded efficiency with effectivity in multi-core duties. With a excessive enhance frequency of 5.5 GHz on its P-cores and help for blazing-fast 6400 MT/s reminiscence, the 285K is tailor-made for customers who want a flexible powerhouse able to dealing with productivity-heavy purposes with out breaking a sweat. Alternatively, AMD’s Ryzen 7 7800X3D focuses on a unique sort of effectivity: precision in gaming and balanced efficiency. With 8 cores and 16 threads, the 7800X3D might sound modest in comparison with Intel’s 24 cores, however its secret weapon lies within the large 96 MB L3 cache. This makes it a standout for avid gamers – particularly in titles that thrive on fast entry to massive knowledge units. And whereas it doesn’t attain the identical clock speeds as Intel’s chip, its 5 nm course of and decrease energy draw make it an interesting selection for individuals who prioritize cooler and quieter methods with out sacrificing gaming efficiency. CPU benchmark efficiency Earlier than we begin, it’s crucial to notice that every one the testing was carried out on the BIOS that shipped with the motherboard, and on preliminary chipset drivers. Although we aren’t anticipating an enormous change, efficiency might differ on launch software program, so bear that in thoughts. Benchmark rig specs When performing benchmarks, we wish to hold issues as constant as attainable, even throughout generations and types. The place we frequently must adapt the benchmark rig to accommodate completely different tech, we use elements that replicate the specs of one another as intently as attainable, as per our how we check CPUs web page. In the event you create favorable circumstances for one piece of {hardware}, the outcomes are now not comparable. With that mentioned, right here’s what comprised our rig by each benchmark classes. Part NameCPUIntel: Intel Core Extremely 285K / AMD: Ryzen 7 7800X3DCoolerCorsair H150i Elite LCDMotherboardIntel: ASUS Maximus Hero Z890 / AMD: ASUS Crosshair X870 Hero MemoryCorsair Dominator Platinum DDR5 @6800 MHzGPUMSI RTX 4070 Ti PSUASUS Thor Platinum II 1000WCaseCooler Grasp Masterframe WePC check bench elements Gaming and artificial efficiency 285K vs 7800X3D gaming 285K vs 7800X3D gaming energy effectivity 285K vs 7800X3D multi core artificial 285K vs 7800X3D single core benchmarks Earlier Subsequent The Intel Core Extremely 9 285K and AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D take completely different paths to high-performance computing, every with its personal strengths. The Core Extremely 9 285K shines in multi-core workloads because of its 24-core hybrid design (8 P-cores, 16 E-cores). This setup permits it to dominate in productiveness duties, delivering scores like 42,399 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 18,866 in CPU-Z Multi – far forward of the 7800X3D’s 17,646 and seven,248, respectively. It’s the best choose for those who’re juggling duties like video enhancing or 3D rendering, providing extra cores and threads to energy by demanding purposes. 285K vs 7800X3D gaming In distinction, AMD’s Ryzen 7 7800X3D focuses on gaming efficiency, leveraging its X3D cache to edge out Intel’s flagship in lots of titles. Video games like Doom Everlasting see the 7800X3D hitting 526.4 FPS in comparison with the 285K’s 499.8 FPS, and even in Horizon Forbidden West, AMD’s CPU leads with 219.8 FPS over Intel’s 202.6 FPS. These beneficial properties, mixed with a usually extra environment friendly energy draw throughout gaming – 68.4W versus the 285K’s 108.04W in Doom Everlasting – make the 7800X3D an interesting selection for pure gaming builds. In the event you’re trying to drive the utmost variety of frames out of your PC, then the 7800X3D is the best way to go. In the end, the selection comes right down to what you worth extra. The Core Extremely 9 285K presents unmatched multi-core energy, making it a go-to for heavy productiveness alongside first rate gaming efficiency. In the meantime, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D focuses on gaming effectivity, delivering smoother gameplay and higher energy consumption in high-refresh-rate situations. Each CPUs have their attraction, however their strengths make them suited to completely different wants, relying on whether or not you’re extra targeted on gaming or productiveness. Are there any platform variations? It is a extra complicated query to reply, because the 7800X3D belongs to AM5, which implies it’s suitable with a variety of motherboards and chipsets that every one supply completely different options. Naturally, regressing right down to earlier chipsets will yield much less superior and feature-rich choices, so, we’re going to stay with the most recent generations. Selecting the most recent technology of {hardware} means you’re getting the same characteristic set, no matter which aspect you go along with. This time, there’s actually no important drawback between the 2. Consider the X870 and Z890 chipsets as simply completely different platforms on your CPU. Both means, you’re getting a strong base. Each chipsets supply help for PCIe Gen 5 throughout GPUs and storage, USB 4, and WiFi 7 (no less than on higher-end fashions – extra budget-friendly boards would possibly range). It’s price noting that Z890 motherboards usually help larger reminiscence speeds in comparison with X870, as seen with fashions just like the ASUS Strix Z890 A. ASUS Strix X870 DDR5 pace ASUS Strix Z890 DDR5 pace Supply: ASUS retailer web page Must you await the 9800X3D? The discharge of the 9800X3D is looming, and if the 7000 collection is something to go off, it’s going to be one heck of a gaming efficiency powerhouse. If the 7800X3D can beat the 9950X then that tells us that the 9800X3D should not have any subject doing the identical. In order for you the very best gaming efficiency then it may be higher to go for the newer X3D CPUs. The 9800X3D additionally nonetheless belongs to AM5, so you’ll be able to set up it onto any AM5 motherboard, you aren’t compelled to shell out a load of cash for a motherboard improve, as you’re on Intel. That mentioned, it’s best to solely think about the 9800X3D if you wish to construct a pure gaming rig – if you wish to go the productiveness route and do some streaming or video enhancing even a bit of bit, it may be extra prudent to choose up a CPU higher at multitasking. Ultimate Phrase: which CPU is best? The battle between the Intel Core Extremely 9 285K Vs AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D reveals distinct strengths catering to completely different consumer wants. The Core Extremely 285K excels in productiveness with its strong hybrid structure, boasting 24 cores that dominate multi-core duties. Nevertheless, its gaming efficiency doesn’t fairly match that of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, which leverages its spectacular 96 MB L3 cache for superior gaming effectivity. Whereas the 285K’s larger clock speeds and reminiscence bandwidth help productivity-heavy purposes, the 7800X3D persistently delivers smoother gameplay with higher energy effectivity, making it the preferable selection for gaming fanatics. As the discharge of the 9800X3D approaches, potential patrons ought to weigh up their priorities fastidiously. If pure gaming efficiency is the aim, the upcoming 9800X3D may outshine each contenders. Nevertheless, for customers balancing productiveness and gaming, the selection leans towards the Core Extremely 285K for multitasking capabilities.